I came over one old article today and i still laugh as much as i did the first time i read it
He creeps along the shelves in the supermarket and avoid all eye contact. He has a confidence about the size of the package raisins in the shopping cart. But when he comes home and sits in front of your computer's suddenly something. Now he is king, and all others are idiots, and he must of course be said, often in a sour tone. Therefore he browsing around online, he was traveling in any online forum, and paying the shift of obscene devices to everyone. He commentary articles online so you almost feel the foaming of the mouth of his. Do you type? On the following pages you can face the worst of the worst.
Do you know the type that always has to be first? He is especially a problem in English-speaking websites, where he just has to be the first to comment on an article. But what he writes? ¿¿First, and not something else. A totally worthless comment, but what can one expect of a 15-year old goof who thinks he is the world's navel
Super Self-Promotion
The next type is a classic. It is he who will do anything to achieve self-promotion in all the world's online forum: - Stop! Windows 7 is something dung.
Check out my Mac blog here. The shameless self promotion is extra embarrassing when he has forgotten to write something interesting to entice people away from a forum or debate thread in an article.
Sometimes he's just all up to write anything, but just snap a link to their own website.
Debate coach Coup
There are some people who get a kick out of debating online, and especially if it concerns their favorite subject. In fact, there is also a group of ¿debate twiter`s ¿who do everything they can to turn a discussion in a new direction.
It means that debate thread, even in an innocent article on charter holiday can develop into a fierce debate about morality , religion and politics.
Here's an example from the real world. The writer behind the blog wrote a post about an asteroid that had come very close to the earth. He wrote: ¿It was as if God threw a snowball and barely missed ¿. This created a lot of comments and the debate ended up being about whether it was possible to find historical evidence that Jesus actually was God.
There are some people who fail to keep their comments within a decent length. They believe that the more they write, the wiser and more important they are. You probably know the type that makes a comment to an article - preferably one that is actually longer than the article itself. This type is also good to use violent quotes and many copies ¿¿-paste phrases from Wikipedia and public authorities in order to emphasize his point. But the message gets lost in the huge amount of text.
The Big Mobb ¿You idiot! You have not understood anything! But what the heck one can well expect from a fucking illiterate ¿. The tone is hard and the comments are personal and abusive. Probably you may also have been a real bad if you've met on this aggressive type, who does everything he can to hang out the outside world. Maybe he misses life in the schoolyard, where he surely was the bully king. The aggressive type does everything he can order to affect the other, and preferably where it stings most.
The Evil moderator
This kind of feels himself above the masses. He has after all been designated as a moderator in a forum. He can delete posts and blocks out users, and he feels that he has almost become God. But he has no particular affection face God. In fact, he does everything he can to make visitors feel unwelcome. If you venture to write something that a previous user has written several years ago, he is ready to turn the legs down hard on you to exhibit your ignorance. His answer comes just a few minutes after you have written your post, because his life is primarily about to sit and stare at the computer screen
The Annoying Boy Scout
, he says it really well, but it just does not help. Boy Scouts break into the debate with statements such as: ¿Remember now, we should have a friendly tone in here. That we tend namely ¿. This happens even though the debate already has a friendly tone, and therefore scout boy's comments nothing more than very annoying. Scout boy does everything he can to mediate between the conflicting parties, but sometimes it seems just a little for assumed. He should go out in the real world and help some old ladies across the road instead.
A know it all will be looking for the truth
The next type is a real know it all makes every effort to find and point out errors and inaccuracies, irrespective of how insignificant they may be. He spends hours trying to find small factual errors, grammatical errors and not to mention spelling mistakes. In reality it is largely to demonstrate intellectual superiority. While it is obviously important to correct inaccuracies, you know better soon's comments seem very swollen and arrogant.
The fanatical fanboy Fanboy
A is characterized by being an uncritical fan of a particular product or brand. He will always line up with a defense of a product, even if it for the rest of the world is entirely foolish. There is at any time up to several Fanboy warrior today. When a slowly fading, you swear that the new war will soon be underway. For many years we had AMD against Intel, Nvidia to ATI. Mac against Windows-camps have been around for years, and does not seem to give in at first. On the gaming front it says steeply between Sony and Microsoft, and Nintendo fans like to try to play the role of scout boy by trying to make peace. You meet the fanatical Fanboy both in debate encourages the articles and the forum today, where he does everything to convince others that he is right, while all others are fools with no credibility. He has after all seen the light. ¿Why should all say something negative about the iPad? It's the biggest revolution ever! And who says that it must have flash? I can manage fine without it. ¿What's the next big war is not good to say, but we're already dreading.
Conspiracy theoretic
¿But who is really behind? ¿Such can read about konspirasjonsteoretikeren report his arrival. This type sees conspiracies everywhere, no matter how unlikely it may be. He believes that he is watched by secret agents, although it is somewhat of a mystery why they have not cleared him of the way long, like he is doing to reveal all kinds of things on the web. Everything seems mysterious in his world and he is guaranteed with a hat made of aluminum foil on his head to prevent UFOs and secret government from reading his thoughts.
Man with the mentally retarded signature
You've probably encountered some of these types of network, which has a monster long signature, which it says name, which computer they have (with all the hardware specs), favorite sayings, selected quotations from wise people, the name of budgies - and the whole course, seasoned with a ridiculous animated GIF image, which jumps up and down. It is to get the headache off. Who needs to know all this? And they are absolutely aware of the spiritual guard it look like?
and you got the famous
One word is enough
The next type uses few words when something should be printed on the web. Actually used only one at a time: - WTF - LOL - lame - Ridiculous This is some of what he writes. According to this fellow needed no more text to explain anything. In return, he diligently to comment on posts. For the most part negative. This modest and almost amputated form of communication paints a picture of a sad man who really wants to have a dialogue, but who have very little to offer.
so the final question is which of these have you encountered the most?
0 Comment`s:
Legg inn en kommentar